<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloverfield 2 &#8211; Cloverfield Sequel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html</link>
	<description>The latest teaser, the latest trailer and the latest movie news at Teaser-Trailer.com!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:21:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john d</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>john d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>how about a view from someone else? ( more steady hands perhaps?) and now and then you see the four people from the first off to the side. but in this movie its a more detailed and different experience. maybe more then one camera shot. one from the oil tanker&#039;s view... like the rise of monster dude. then one from the ferry boat passing the statue of liberty ( u know how tourist  love making videos) maybe a soldiers  head cam as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about a view from someone else? ( more steady hands perhaps?) and now and then you see the four people from the first off to the side. but in this movie its a more detailed and different experience. maybe more then one camera shot. one from the oil tanker&#8217;s view&#8230; like the rise of monster dude. then one from the ferry boat passing the statue of liberty ( u know how tourist  love making videos) maybe a soldiers  head cam as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dieter</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-5420</link>
		<dc:creator>Dieter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-5420</guid>
		<description>WTF, comparing Godzilla with this movie... shame to you all...
Finaly a movie I like. The shaking and not seeing the whole picture is awsome. I realy don&#039;t like movies that you are forced to eat. This movie really rocked and I&#039;m glad I spent my money on it. I have seen MUCH worse!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF, comparing Godzilla with this movie&#8230; shame to you all&#8230;<br />
Finaly a movie I like. The shaking and not seeing the whole picture is awsome. I realy don&#8217;t like movies that you are forced to eat. This movie really rocked and I&#8217;m glad I spent my money on it. I have seen MUCH worse!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newt</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>I think Mummy should come looking for baby, although the city would need to change, need new things to break ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mummy should come looking for baby, although the city would need to change, need new things to break ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norton Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4536</link>
		<dc:creator>Norton Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4536</guid>
		<description>I think it would be cool if there was a second Cloverfield monster with a Handycam, filming the first Cloverfield monster, the first extraterrestrial home video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be cool if there was a second Cloverfield monster with a Handycam, filming the first Cloverfield monster, the first extraterrestrial home video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brimstone</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4447</link>
		<dc:creator>Brimstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4447</guid>
		<description>I believe that Cloverfield is a project named by the government and so not giving a direct name to the monster they just simply call it Cloverfield.
However i believe that not giving the type of species the monster is is absolute genius i also would like to say that this is something for movie history. And for those that say Godzilla should return are not very bright to even think that he&#039;s been retired for a good long time. Why recreate a past just to please a group of audience for their money worths even though that J.J. did pointed out this monster we see in our generation is the newest of the family. Bringing Godzilla into Cloverfield&#039;s project will not be a big crowd pleaser in my opinion. Rates of the movie would go down and because of you people wanting Godzilla J.J. would say fuck you for brainwashing me into making a bastardized idea i fell into for fans sakes of keeping a dead legacy alive. J.J. wants to create a new monster and which he did not only just the monster but a scenerio, a partial view of who this creature is and now slowly understanding where he came from.
For Cloverfield 2 i&#039;m only saying to a sugguestion. Maybe a military view and few more views from other citizens in NYC. Link them together later on in life and have a reminder that the military has now seen the face of the project coming alive. You know how the government would go to a UFO crash without hesitation well maybe theres an idea except the monster was still alive and the military couldnt contain the beast much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Cloverfield is a project named by the government and so not giving a direct name to the monster they just simply call it Cloverfield.<br />
However i believe that not giving the type of species the monster is is absolute genius i also would like to say that this is something for movie history. And for those that say Godzilla should return are not very bright to even think that he&#8217;s been retired for a good long time. Why recreate a past just to please a group of audience for their money worths even though that J.J. did pointed out this monster we see in our generation is the newest of the family. Bringing Godzilla into Cloverfield&#8217;s project will not be a big crowd pleaser in my opinion. Rates of the movie would go down and because of you people wanting Godzilla J.J. would say fuck you for brainwashing me into making a bastardized idea i fell into for fans sakes of keeping a dead legacy alive. J.J. wants to create a new monster and which he did not only just the monster but a scenerio, a partial view of who this creature is and now slowly understanding where he came from.<br />
For Cloverfield 2 i&#8217;m only saying to a sugguestion. Maybe a military view and few more views from other citizens in NYC. Link them together later on in life and have a reminder that the military has now seen the face of the project coming alive. You know how the government would go to a UFO crash without hesitation well maybe theres an idea except the monster was still alive and the military couldnt contain the beast much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1238308016">Josh Warner</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="1238308016">Josh Warner</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>monster versus monster.....nuff said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>monster versus monster&#8230;..nuff said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4380</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4380</guid>
		<description>Oh and, when I saw the pic of the monster...O_O wow, that is pretty scary XD freaked me out enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and, when I saw the pic of the monster&#8230;O_O wow, that is pretty scary XD freaked me out enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4379</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4379</guid>
		<description>Show the monsters face this time in the movie!! XD you must! Pleeeeaaaaase! hahahahaha I sort of disagree whit what most of the people are saying about how the camera moved....I really liked it, it was kind of a unique feel to it and it kept me watching the move (as well as what was happening, the camera just added to the drama and action). Can&#039;t wait for a sequel!! ^o^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show the monsters face this time in the movie!! XD you must! Pleeeeaaaaase! hahahahaha I sort of disagree whit what most of the people are saying about how the camera moved&#8230;.I really liked it, it was kind of a unique feel to it and it kept me watching the move (as well as what was happening, the camera just added to the drama and action). Can&#8217;t wait for a sequel!! ^o^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-4342</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-4342</guid>
		<description>Just to set things straight on the shaky cam. In film school one of the first things I learned back in the 90&#039;s was shaky cam is an industry &quot;no-no&quot;. So when I see this, even though I think it can be used brilliantly like in Cloverfield, it gets me mad knowing I was told by professors this is poorly constructed cinema. I truly wonder what is being taught this days now this form is being used more often in films. Enough on that. CF2 needs to have more of a military presence in the film than the first one. People in the theater were basically jumping up and down when our jets and armor were attacking the creature rooting for them to kill it. I can&#039;t recall another recent film where I&#039;ve experienced the audience get into it as much as they did with CF. All that tells me is that J.J. accomplished what he was trying to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to set things straight on the shaky cam. In film school one of the first things I learned back in the 90&#8217;s was shaky cam is an industry &#8220;no-no&#8221;. So when I see this, even though I think it can be used brilliantly like in Cloverfield, it gets me mad knowing I was told by professors this is poorly constructed cinema. I truly wonder what is being taught this days now this form is being used more often in films. Enough on that. CF2 needs to have more of a military presence in the film than the first one. People in the theater were basically jumping up and down when our jets and armor were attacking the creature rooting for them to kill it. I can&#8217;t recall another recent film where I&#8217;ve experienced the audience get into it as much as they did with CF. All that tells me is that J.J. accomplished what he was trying to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://teaser-trailer.com/2009/01/cloverfield-2-cloverfield-sequel.html#comment-3775</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teaser-trailer.com/?p=3655#comment-3775</guid>
		<description>Well, i really loved the movie with the fact that, you have no idea what is happening and why. And for once, you get to see the fighting against the National guard and Clover. But i think that the shaky camera thing is okay. But this time, the main character should be a soldier who is following clover. Not a god damn love story, but in a way a war movie. What the government is doing against clover and what happens after Hammer Down. And maybe a part where they are evacuating and have the parasites attacking people. But  i say there should be more fighting, like Apaches and cobras. And maybe an Osprey evacuating people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i really loved the movie with the fact that, you have no idea what is happening and why. And for once, you get to see the fighting against the National guard and Clover. But i think that the shaky camera thing is okay. But this time, the main character should be a soldier who is following clover. Not a god damn love story, but in a way a war movie. What the government is doing against clover and what happens after Hammer Down. And maybe a part where they are evacuating and have the parasites attacking people. But  i say there should be more fighting, like Apaches and cobras. And maybe an Osprey evacuating people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
